Finvest
FRHC Financial services · Fintech · Kazakhstan · Brokerage · Thesis updated June 14, 2026

Profits are strong, but concentration is flashing red

01 Running thesis

A profitable core with two loud alarms

Freedom Holding has a real and profitable core. In fiscal 2026, Brokerage earned $456.2M of net income, Banking earned $102.0M, and Insurance earned $30.0M. That gives the company money to fund a wider digital ecosystem in Kazakhstan and nearby markets.

The bear case has become harder to ignore. The Other segment, which includes telecom and media projects, lost $362.3M for the year. Management has disclosed $84.1M of Freedom Telecom capital expenditure commitments as of March 31, 2026, but investors still do not have a full project budget or a clear break-even date.

The bigger quality problem is concentration. A single market maker customer at Freedom Global generated $345.5M, or 71%, of total fee and commission income in fiscal 2026. If that customer leaves, reprices, or slows activity, the main profit center could change very quickly.

The next 12 months should be judged by three simple tests: whether quarterly Other losses fall below $75M, whether the single customer share drops below 50% of fee and commission income, and whether management gives a clear budget and timeline for telecom and media.

Jun 2026The fiscal 2026 10-K confirmed that the core segments are profitable, but risk rose. Other lost $362.3M for the year, and one market maker rose to 71% of total fee and commission income.
Feb 2026Q3 fiscal 2026 net income rebounded to $76.2M, helped by Banking. The offset was worse Other segment losses of $108.0M for the quarter and still-heavy market maker concentration at 68% of fee and commission income.
Nov 2025Q2 fiscal 2026 showed weaker earnings, a Banking loss, and a $64.4M loss in Other. The single market maker share climbed to 74% of fee and commission income for the quarter.
Aug 2025Q1 fiscal 2026 revenue grew, but profit fell and Other lost $59.5M. The market maker concentration rose to 67% of fee and commission income.
Jun 2025Fiscal 2025 net income fell to $84.5M from $375.0M despite higher revenue. The filing also showed 56% fee and commission concentration in one market maker and planned losses in telecom and media.
Feb 2025Q3 fiscal 2025 showed strong revenue growth but lower profit. Insurance turned to a loss, Other losses widened, and one market maker represented 54% of fee and commission income.
Nov 2024Insurance and Banking customer growth supported the ecosystem story, but net income was flat while expenses rose. A single market maker represented 59% of fee and commission income for the quarter.
Aug 2024Q1 fiscal 2025 showed a 50% year-over-year drop in net income and a trading securities loss. The company also disclosed that one market maker produced 56% of fee and commission income for the quarter.
02 Business model

A finance app that keeps adding pieces

Freedom makes money from brokerage commissions, underwriting fees, bank interest income, margin lending, trading gains, and insurance premiums. The company tries to keep customers inside one group of products, from trading on Tradernet to banking, cards, loans, insurance, payments, tickets, travel, telecom, and media.

That model can be powerful when each part feeds the others. A brokerage client can become a bank client. A bank client can buy insurance. A payments or travel user can be pulled into the finance app.

The model breaks if the add-on businesses keep losing too much money, or if the core brokerage economics depend on one outside customer. Fiscal 2026 showed both risks at the same time: strong legacy profits, a $362.3M Other loss, and 71% fee and commission concentration in one market maker.

03 Product portfolio

What Freedom sells

Cash cow

Brokerage

Brokerage offers retail trading, over-the-counter securities access, margin lending, underwriting, and advisory work. Tradernet is the main trading platform, and Freedom Capital Markets serves U.S. investment banking and capital markets clients.

Growth engine

Banking

Freedom Bank KZ offers deposits, cards, digital mortgages, digital car loans, and commercial banking. The segment earned $102.0M of net income in fiscal 2026.

Steady

Insurance

Freedom Life and Freedom Insurance sell life, health, annuity, property, casualty, and liability products. The segment stayed profitable in fiscal 2026, but a regulatory cap on agent commissions has pressured parts of the business.

Option

Payments, tickets, and travel

Paybox, Ticketon, and Aviata add payment processing, online ticket sales, and travel services. These products support the wider ecosystem but sit inside the loss-making Other segment.

Option

Telecom and media

Freedom Telecom and Freedom Media are the biggest strategic bets in Other. They could deepen customer use over time, but today they are a major drain on capital.

04 Business segments

Fiscal 2026 revenue mix

Brokerage38%modest
Banking31%growing fast
Insurance23%declining
Other8%growing fast

The segment mix uses fiscal 2026 revenue: Brokerage $831.5M, Banking $689.2M, Insurance $497.8M, and Other $172.8M. Profit mix is much less balanced because Other lost $362.3M, while one market maker drove 71% of fee and commission income.

05 Risk factors

What could go wrong

Single market maker shock

High impact · High odds

One market maker customer generated $345.5M of fee and commission income in fiscal 2026. That was 71% of total fee and commission income, up from 56% in fiscal 2025. If this customer leaves or gets better terms, reported brokerage profits could fall fast.

We watchThe market maker customer share of total fee and commission income, especially whether it falls below 50% or stays near 71%.

Other segment cash drain

High impact · High odds

The Other segment lost $362.3M in fiscal 2026. This segment includes telecom and media, where the company is still investing heavily. The risk is that these projects keep using capital without proving they can earn it back.

We watchQuarterly Other segment losses, with below $75M as the first sign that burn is getting under control.

Unclear telecom budget

High impact · Medium odds

Freedom Telecom had disclosed capital expenditure commitments of $84.1M as of March 31, 2026. The bigger issue is that investors still lack a full project budget and a clear break-even timeline. That makes the final cost hard to judge.

We watchA management disclosure that gives total expected telecom and media spending, funding needs, and a break-even date.

SEC enforcement risk

High impact · Medium odds

The company has disclosed a Wells Notice from the SEC, which means SEC staff may recommend a civil enforcement action. The final outcome is still an open question. A serious action could bring fines, restrictions, or reputational damage.

We watchAny SEC settlement, complaint, fine, or company update on the Wells Notice process.

Kazakhstan and sanctions exposure

Medium impact · Medium odds

Freedom is heavily tied to Kazakhstan and other emerging markets. These markets can face political, currency, banking, and regulatory shocks. The Russia-Ukraine war also keeps secondary sanctions risk in view, even after the company sold Russian subsidiaries.

We watchNew sanctions actions, rating agency moves, Kazakhstan currency stress, or limits on cross-border financial activity.

Governance and related-party concerns

Medium impact · Medium odds

Freedom is a controlled company, and CEO Timur Turlov has controlling ownership. The company has a history of transactions with entities tied to the CEO, even though one major omnibus arrangement with FST Belize was terminated. Investors still need to watch whether capital is allocated for all shareholders, not just insiders.

We watchNew related-party transactions, board independence changes, and disclosures involving CEO-controlled entities.
06 Quick answers

In one breath

What does Freedom Holding Corp. actually do?

Freedom Holding is a financial services holding company. It runs brokerage, banking, insurance, payments, travel, tickets, telecom, and media businesses, with Kazakhstan as the main center of gravity.

Why is FRHC risky if it is profitable?

The core businesses are profitable, but the quality of that profit is the issue. One market maker produced 71% of fee and commission income in fiscal 2026, and the Other segment lost $362.3M.

What would make the FRHC thesis better?

The clearest positives would be lower Other segment losses, less dependence on the single market maker customer, and a clear telecom and media budget. These would show that growth is becoming easier to fund.

What is the most important number to watch?

The single customer share of fee and commission income is the key number. It was 71% in fiscal 2026, which is a very high level of dependence for a core profit stream.